Re-Branding: What did I just say?
Published 20051122 by Olivier Blanchard | E-mail this post
Didn't we just discuss
re-branding?
*sigh*
Read two great little articles on AT&T's latest little exercise in futility
here and
here.
Also, if you're interested in the evolution of the at&t (formerly AT&T) logo, check out
this little chart. Lastly, for the telecom giant's reasoning behind the whole thing, go
here.
Exerpt:
"The new logo reinvigorates the AT&T globe — one of the most recognized corporate symbols in the world. The new globe is three-dimensional, representing the expanding breadth and depth of services that the new AT&T family of companies provides to customers, as well as its global presence."*gag*
Tip: When you already have
one of the most recognized corporate symbols in the world, don't just change it because... you think it needs to be more three-dimensional... or more appealing to a younger crowd. Your logo wasn't the problem, AT&T. It's probably the only thing about your organization that needed to be left untouched. Tsk...
So who's next? Nike? Adidas? Coca Cola? Mattel? Sony? Volkswagen? Land Rover? Starbucks?
Let's hope not.
Ok, I gave my "turkey award" to the retail industry on my blog today. But I now think these guys deserve it more.
Great post. A reminder to us all that branding is more than graphics. And, wouldn't it be nice if AT&T would actually fix some of the things about its brand that need fixing? Probably not going to happen, but it's a nice thought and I'm not sure why it's so obscure to grasp.
Perhaps you'd consider giving us a list of tips on things to consider when "rebranding" that dig deeper than the superficial?